From the 1 st meeting of CEM-2009 that we had in late 2008, so we decided to carry out activity for assembly, in front of the Museum Castagnino last Friday called INFOM DAY, "has been a process (perhaps unpublished) for discussion and action-participation-reflection in which we got to know better and integrating partners of 1 year.
I think it open to make an assessment (ie found to include insights and / or conflicting, why not "polyphonic") and self-criticism in order to deepen this process builder of the school as students.
I will try to express some basic ideas and personal conclusions that can be refuted and / or shared in a dynamic of permanent return among us.
The school is public, free, secular and free . Yes, achievements of the university reform almost a century ago (1918), which preceded the French May for 50 years. . . Municipal State depends, anyone entering high school diploma, without any social discrimination, political, religious, etc, and it's free.
That is, on the one hand, the State is responsible for the budget for her, her maintenance, education policy, charges of open and public competitions that should carry out, their teachers and not -teachers, etc., and on the other hand, we, the students are the beneficiaries of this education, and today its main victims.
is in this context and in the exercise of our right to study that appeal to the authorities, calls for the urgent convening of contests teaching positions, and we can demand a higher education budget, an institutionalization of paid internships and pre-professional as has been, a better academic, a matching of teachers' salaries with those of the UNR or provincial, etc., etc.
our right to organize / autoconvocados independently, together with our teachers, other students in tertiary courses, with municipal workers and / or the community.
I also think we need to remember our right to free speech, disseminating and publishing and circulating our ideas without censorship.
If we accept that education is a right, the first premise is that not negotiated, and defended. We have nothing to "negotiate" with these officials ahead on Tuesday for talks at the Ministry of Culture and came to the village of Castagnino with the promise of long competitions teachers and school management. I think we should demand that fulfill their responsibilities, nothing more. . . nothing less.
The second basic idea is that NO FEE , neither open nor covertly, or through bond contribution, or the formation of a cooperative.
The action decided at a meeting, I think it was a "success" before undertaken. That is, for now we get our answer, we convened for Monday 9 am, to unlock the situation last year for not competitions were held, we promise orally, both De Zorzi as Farina, the immediate call for contests held teaching and school leadership.
This "success" (which also includes the act of displaying our flag "MUSEOLOGY STUDENTS" and deliver all the frills this information to the public) of "door-in" had many hesitations, voting and against -votes that reflect fears in my opinion, disorientation and / or lack of foundation of some colleagues. That's why I feel super-duper important to reflect on our different ideas and proposals. Do not forget our arguments and differences, the better we build with them consolidating our power in common. In this regard, and even here I think we always respect the majority decision, and actively enforced, meaning that overall we took, for example, to distribute the flyers, even those who preferred to postpone it until you see what happens in the next meeting with Culture .
A third idea is that IT IS NOT DEMOCRACY a pipe dream, but a construction, a permanent and daily. At this point I think it is commendable that from the EMF we horizontality decision-making power, we run in the assembly and / or in an open and participatory.
This is a return. I hope the return
Marisa DomÃnguez (June 7, 2009)
I think it open to make an assessment (ie found to include insights and / or conflicting, why not "polyphonic") and self-criticism in order to deepen this process builder of the school as students.
I will try to express some basic ideas and personal conclusions that can be refuted and / or shared in a dynamic of permanent return among us.
The school is public, free, secular and free . Yes, achievements of the university reform almost a century ago (1918), which preceded the French May for 50 years. . . Municipal State depends, anyone entering high school diploma, without any social discrimination, political, religious, etc, and it's free.
That is, on the one hand, the State is responsible for the budget for her, her maintenance, education policy, charges of open and public competitions that should carry out, their teachers and not -teachers, etc., and on the other hand, we, the students are the beneficiaries of this education, and today its main victims.
is in this context and in the exercise of our right to study that appeal to the authorities, calls for the urgent convening of contests teaching positions, and we can demand a higher education budget, an institutionalization of paid internships and pre-professional as has been, a better academic, a matching of teachers' salaries with those of the UNR or provincial, etc., etc.
our right to organize / autoconvocados independently, together with our teachers, other students in tertiary courses, with municipal workers and / or the community.
I also think we need to remember our right to free speech, disseminating and publishing and circulating our ideas without censorship.
If we accept that education is a right, the first premise is that not negotiated, and defended. We have nothing to "negotiate" with these officials ahead on Tuesday for talks at the Ministry of Culture and came to the village of Castagnino with the promise of long competitions teachers and school management. I think we should demand that fulfill their responsibilities, nothing more. . . nothing less.
The second basic idea is that NO FEE , neither open nor covertly, or through bond contribution, or the formation of a cooperative.
The action decided at a meeting, I think it was a "success" before undertaken. That is, for now we get our answer, we convened for Monday 9 am, to unlock the situation last year for not competitions were held, we promise orally, both De Zorzi as Farina, the immediate call for contests held teaching and school leadership.
This "success" (which also includes the act of displaying our flag "MUSEOLOGY STUDENTS" and deliver all the frills this information to the public) of "door-in" had many hesitations, voting and against -votes that reflect fears in my opinion, disorientation and / or lack of foundation of some colleagues. That's why I feel super-duper important to reflect on our different ideas and proposals. Do not forget our arguments and differences, the better we build with them consolidating our power in common. In this regard, and even here I think we always respect the majority decision, and actively enforced, meaning that overall we took, for example, to distribute the flyers, even those who preferred to postpone it until you see what happens in the next meeting with Culture .
A third idea is that IT IS NOT DEMOCRACY a pipe dream, but a construction, a permanent and daily. At this point I think it is commendable that from the EMF we horizontality decision-making power, we run in the assembly and / or in an open and participatory.
This is a return. I hope the return
Marisa DomÃnguez (June 7, 2009)
0 comments:
Post a Comment